Wen Calls China Banks Too Powerful

N&P: Discussion of news headlines and politics.

Moderator: frigidmagi

Post Reply
User avatar
frigidmagi
Dragon Death-Marine General
Posts: 14757
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 am
21
Location: Alone and unafraid

#1 Wen Calls China Banks Too Powerful

Post by frigidmagi »

NYTimes
Prime Minister Wen Jiabao of China said on Tuesday that the nation’s biggest state-run banks have too much power and ought to be broken up because they earn far too much money.

The remarks, delivered during a national radio address while the prime minister was traveling in southern China, were unusually bold and appeared to be a direct challenge to others in the nation’s Communist Party leadership to speed up reforms of the nation’s financial system.

According to China National Radio, Mr. Wen said: “Frankly, our banks make profits far too easily. Why? Because a small number of major banks occupy a monopoly position, meaning one can only go to them for loans and capital.”

“That’s why right now, as we’re dealing with the issue of getting private capital into the finance sector, essentially, that means we have to break up their monopoly,” he added.

Mr. Wen, who is expected to step down later this year as part of a once-in-a-decade leadership change, has been striking an increasingly vocal tone in recent months about political and economic reform and suggesting that vested interests in the Communist Party leadership were stubbornly protecting their hold on power and derailing his reform efforts.

Whether Mr. Wen has the political influence to force changes in the banking system is unclear. While he oversees the nation’s economic policy, many analysts say the Communist Party’s consensus method of ruling limits his ability to push through his own policies.

That is perhaps why Mr. Wen has begun to signal his frustration with the party about some major areas of politics and economics.

Eswar S. Prasad, a former International Monetary Fund official who teaches at Cornell University, said Tuesday that Mr. Wen’s remarks “reflect a growing consensus among reform-minded officials that breaking up the large banks may be an essential step to reduce their political influence and pave the way for broad, much-needed reforms to the financial system.”

The state’s control over the economy has been a chief point of contention among policy makers, with some pressing for greater state control and others favoring more aid to private companies.

There may also be more to the prime minister’s remarks. They come at a time when there is fierce jockeying for power in the leadership and an internal debate over how to deal with Bo Xilai, a Politburo member who was dismissed recently from his job as party secretary in the city of Chongqing.

Analysts think various power bases in the Communist Party are now battling it out to see who will gain a majority of nine seats on the all-powerful Politburo Standing Committee later this year.

Because he is nearing retirement, Mr. Wen may be trying to make a final reform push in his last months in office, analysts say, but also moving to challenge his opponents on important issues.

He has also been a vocal critic of property developers in recent years and helped push through policies aimed at taming property prices out of fears that a housing bubble was developing and that average people were finding it too expensive to buy a home.

Challenging the big state-run banks will not be easy, though. China’s big four state-run banks dominate the economy, holding most of the nation’s financial assets. And they have been racking up huge profits in recent years, largely because of a lack of competition and strict government controls over lending and borrowing rates.

The banks have made some of that money, analysts say, at the expense of households, which receive little interest on their savings but pay high borrowing rates.

Private entrepreneurs have also complained about the financial system, saying big state-owned banks discriminate against them in lending and favor state companies, forcing many private companies to pay higher rates in the black market.

A series of scandals in coastal areas, involving underground banking and entrepreneurs racking up huge debt, has highlighted the need for reform. Many households, seeing they earn little interest from state banks, have invested in property and lent money to private individuals hoping to reap outsize returns.

Beijing announced last week that it would set up a pilot project in the city of Wenzhou, in coastal Zhejiang Province, to allow residents to more easily invest overseas and introduce private lending units, including village banks.

But banking is hardly the only industry with a state oligopoly. There are also big state-owned oil and telecom companies, each of which earns huge profits and which have recently faced protests from the public over consumer prices.
I...

I agree with a communist official...

Fuck me, I need a shower.

Let me explain. Despite the conservative narrative that this is all the fault of people who bought a house and those poor innocent banks didn't do anything wrong (bullshit). The plain fact of the matter is that if banks weren't allowed to get so big and be both a bank and investment company, this wouldn't have gotten so bad.

Be a bank. Or be an investment firm. Never should the twain meet. If something gets to big to fail, you should chop it up. This is what I learned from 2008.
"it takes two sides to end a war but only one to start one. And those who do not have swords may still die upon them." Tolken
User avatar
General Havoc
Mr. Party-Killbot
Posts: 5245
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 2:12 pm
21
Location: The City that is not Frisco
Contact:

#2 Re: Wen Calls China Banks Too Powerful

Post by General Havoc »

China's economy is one of the most corrupt on earth, and parsing this out will take a great deal of time. This is internal Chinese language here.
Gaze upon my works, ye mighty, and despair...

Havoc: "So basically if you side against him, he summons Cthulu."
Hotfoot: "Yes, which is reasonable."
User avatar
Josh
Resident of the Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery
Posts: 8114
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 4:51 pm
21
Location: Kingdom of Eternal Cockjobbery

#3 Re: Wen Calls China Banks Too Powerful

Post by Josh »

You can barely call China communist these days, if you ever really could. It's a command economy, but like pretty much every other communist experiment it never got past the whole 'centralize the economy' and over to 'let the proles run the show' thing, because once the authority was consolidated those in authority were amazingly uninspired to surrender power. So it is like every functional example of large-scale communist experimentation, but it's not what Marx or even Lenin had in mind when they talked communism.

(Because shit don't work, but that's another argument.)

But basically it's a very similar situation to ours- institutions become powerful and blend with the government in our case, or they start out as organs of the state in theirs. Either way, they create a captive audience and extract resources from them.
When the Frog God smiles, arm yourself.
"'Flammable' and 'inflammable' have the same meaning! This language is insane!"
GIVE ME COFFEE AND I WILL ALLOW YOU TO LIVE!- Frigid
"Ork 'as no automatic code o' survival. 'is partic'lar distinction from all udda livin' gits is tha necessity ta act inna face o' alternatives by means o' dakka."
I created the sound of madness, wrote the book on pain
Post Reply